“An atheist is a man who watches a Notre Dame–Southern Methodist University game and doesn’t care who wins.” – Dwight D. Eisenhower
While atheists often critique theistic beliefs, they sometimes misunderstand their own worldview. Some atheists hold misconceptions about atheism itself, its philosophical implications, and its limitations. Below are 15 common errorsthat fail to provide a coherent or consistent atheistic worldview.
1. Atheism is Just a Lack of Belief
Some atheists claim that atheism is merely the absence of belief in God, avoiding the burden of proof. However, this misrepresents atheism as a passive position.
Philosopher Peter Kreeft explains, “Atheism is not merely a lack of belief in God; it is a denial of the existence of God, which entails its own philosophical commitments.”¹ Atheists make implicit claims about reality, morality, and existence that require justification.
Anticipating Objection:
- Objection: “Atheism doesn’t make any claims; it just rejects theism.”
- Response: Rejecting theism still requires explaining alternative views on questions of existence, purpose, and morality.
¹ Peter Kreeft, Handbook of Christian Apologetics (Downers Grove: IVP Academic, 1994).
2. Atheism is the Default Position
Some atheists argue that atheism is the default worldview, requiring no evidence. However, the default position on any claim is agnosticism or neutrality, not a denial of the claim.
Philosopher Alvin Plantinga notes, “To affirm atheism is to adopt a position that, like theism, requires evidence and argument.”² Atheism involves making claims about the nature of reality and therefore must meet the same evidential standards as theism.
Anticipating Objection:
- Objection: “Atheism is the default because it doesn’t add unnecessary assumptions.”
- Response: Atheism is not neutral; it asserts that God does not exist, which is a claim requiring support.
² Alvin Plantinga, God and Other Minds (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1967).
3. Atheism is Based Solely on Reason
Many atheists claim that their position is purely rational, free from emotion or bias. However, atheism often involves metaphysical assumptions that go beyond empirical evidence.
C.S. Lewis wrote, “Atheism turns out to be too simple. If the whole universe has no meaning, we should never have found out that it has no meaning.”³ Even atheistic naturalism involves philosophical commitments that cannot be empirically proven.
Anticipating Objection:
- Objection: “Atheism is rational because it rejects unproven claims.”
- Response: Atheism relies on philosophical assumptions, such as naturalism or materialism, that themselves require justification.
³ C.S. Lewis, Mere Christianity (New York: HarperOne, 1952).
4. Atheism is Free from Faith
Atheists often criticize faith as irrational, claiming atheism requires none. However, atheism involves faith in unprovable assumptions, such as the reliability of human reason and the uniformity of nature.
John Lennox argues, “Atheists have faith too—faith in the rational intelligibility of the universe and their ability to comprehend it.”⁴ Both theism and atheism require some level of faith to interpret reality.
Anticipating Objection:
- Objection: “Faith is belief without evidence, which atheism rejects.”
- Response: Faith, properly understood, is trust based on evidence, and atheists exhibit faith in principles that cannot be empirically verified.
⁴ John Lennox, Can Science Explain Everything? (Oxford: Lion Hudson, 2019).
5. Atheism Avoids the Problem of Evil
Some atheists claim that the problem of evil is only a challenge for theism. However, atheism must also explain the existence of evil or suffering in a purely naturalistic framework.
Philosopher Michael Ruse admits, “I do not see how being an evolutionist makes one immune to the problem of evil.”⁵ Without God, moral outrage at evil becomes subjective and lacks ultimate justification.
Anticipating Objection:
- Objection: “Evil disproves God, so it’s not a problem for atheism.”
- Response: The existence of evil presupposes an objective standard of morality, which atheism struggles to account for.
⁵ Michael Ruse, Darwin and Design: Does Evolution Have a Purpose? (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2003).
6. Atheism Provides a Better Foundation for Morality
Some atheists claim that morality can be entirely explained through naturalistic means, such as evolution or social contracts, without appealing to God. However, this fails to provide an objective basis for moral values and duties.
Philosopher J.L. Mackie, an atheist, admitted, “If… there are objective values, they make the existence of a god more probable than it would have been without them.”⁶ Without God, morality becomes subjective and culturally relative.
Anticipating Objection:
- Objection: “Morality evolved as a survival mechanism and doesn’t require God.”
- Response: Evolution can explain behaviors, but it cannot establish why certain actions are objectively right or wrong. Theism grounds morality in the character of God, providing a universal standard.
⁶ J.L. Mackie, The Miracle of Theism (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982).
7. Atheism Explains Purpose Without God
Atheists often argue that individuals can create their own purpose in life without needing God. However, self-constructed purpose lacks ultimate significance in a godless universe.
William Lane Craig writes, “If God does not exist, then both man and the universe are doomed to death. Man’s life is but a spark in the infinite blackness.”⁷ Without a transcendent source, purpose becomes fleeting and illusory.
Anticipating Objection:
- Objection: “We can define our own purpose without appealing to a deity.”
- Response: Subjective purpose may provide personal satisfaction but fails to answer why the universe exists or why human life has intrinsic value.
⁷ William Lane Craig, Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics (Wheaton: Crossway, 2008).
8. Atheism is Neutral About Religion
Some atheists claim their worldview is neutral, simply rejecting theistic claims. However, atheism entails its own philosophical assumptions, such as materialism and naturalism, which must also be scrutinized.
Alister McGrath explains, “Atheism is not merely a rejection of religion but a rival worldview that makes significant claims about the nature of reality.”⁸ Atheism is not neutral—it actively denies the existence of God and promotes an alternative framework.
Anticipating Objection:
- Objection: “Atheism is neutral; it doesn’t make any claims.”
- Response: Denying God’s existence is itself a claim about reality, morality, and the origins of existence, which must be defended.
⁸ Alister McGrath, The Twilight of Atheism (New York: Doubleday, 2004).
9. Science Supports Atheism Over Theism
Many atheists argue that science inherently supports atheism, claiming it eliminates the need for God. However, science is a method of studying the natural world and is silent on metaphysical questions.
Physicist John Polkinghorne writes, “Science is powerless to answer the fundamental questions of why there is a universe at all, why it is rationally structured, and why we are here.”⁹ Theism, not atheism, provides a coherent explanation for these questions.
Anticipating Objection:
- Objection: “Science disproves God by explaining natural processes.”
- Response: Explaining natural processes does not negate God; it reveals how God sustains the universe. Science and theism address complementary aspects of reality.
⁹ John Polkinghorne, Science and the Trinity (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004).
10. Atheism Avoids the “Burden of Proof”
Some atheists claim that only theists bear the burden of proof in debates about God’s existence. However, atheism is a claim about reality and must also provide evidence and arguments to support its position.
Philosopher Antony Flew, who transitioned from atheism to theism, wrote, “The case for atheism must be made; it is not automatically true by default.”¹⁰ Both atheism and theism must offer evidence and reasoning for their claims.
Anticipating Objection:
- Objection: “Atheism doesn’t need evidence because it rejects unproven claims.”
- Response: Rejecting theism still requires an alternative explanation for existence, morality, and meaning, which must be substantiated.
¹⁰ Antony Flew, There Is a God: How the World’s Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind (New York: HarperOne, 2007).
11. Atheism Can Fully Explain Consciousness
Atheists often claim that consciousness arises entirely from physical brain processes. However, this fails to address the “hard problem” of subjective experience, such as thoughts, emotions, and self-awareness.
Philosopher David Chalmers writes, “Consciousness is an anomaly that stubbornly resists reduction to physical processes.”¹¹ Theism provides a more coherent explanation, viewing consciousness as part of the soul made in God’s image (Genesis 1:27).
Anticipating Objection:
- Objection: “Consciousness is just brain activity.”
- Response: While brain activity correlates with consciousness, it does not explain subjective experience or the immaterial aspects of thought and identity.
¹¹ David Chalmers, The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).
12. Atheism is Free from Bias
Atheists often claim their worldview is purely rational and unbiased, contrasting it with what they perceive as the emotional or cultural bias of theism. However, atheism is just as subject to cognitive bias and cultural influence as any other belief system.
Michael Ruse notes, “Darwinism is promulgated as an ideology, a secular religion… a full-fledged alternative to Christianity.”¹² Atheists are not immune to ideological influences or emotional motivations in their rejection of theism.
Anticipating Objection:
- Objection: “Atheism is purely rational and free from cultural baggage.”
- Response: Atheism, like theism, is shaped by personal, cultural, and philosophical factors that require self-awareness and critical evaluation.
¹² Michael Ruse, Can a Darwinian Be a Christian? (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001).
13. Atheism Avoids the Problem of Origins
Some atheists argue that the origin of the universe is irrelevant to atheism, claiming science will eventually explain it. However, the question of why the universe exists at all remains unanswered by naturalism.
G.W. Leibniz asked, “Why is there something rather than nothing?”¹³ Atheism struggles to provide a satisfying answer, whereas theism posits a necessary, self-existent Creator.
Anticipating Objection:
- Objection: “The universe could exist without a cause.”
- Response: A self-existent God provides a more coherent explanation for the universe’s existence than the assertion of a causeless, contingent universe.
¹³ G.W. Leibniz, Monadology.
14. Atheism Does Not Require Faith
Atheists often reject the idea that their worldview involves faith, associating faith exclusively with religion. However, atheism requires faith in principles such as the reliability of reason, the uniformity of nature, and the absence of God.
Philosopher John Lennox states, “Atheists have faith too—faith in the rational intelligibility of the universe.”¹⁴ Both atheists and theists rely on faith to make sense of the world.
Anticipating Objection:
- Objection: “Faith is belief without evidence, so atheism has none.”
- Response: Faith, properly understood, is trust based on evidence. Atheists exhibit faith in philosophical principles that cannot be empirically proven.
¹⁴ John Lennox, Can Science Explain Everything?
15. Atheism is the End of the Discussion
Some atheists view atheism as the final answer to questions about existence and meaning. However, atheism raises as many questions as it answers, leaving ultimate issues unresolved.
Philosopher Alister McGrath explains, “Atheism is not the end of the story but raises deeper questions about morality, meaning, and the existence of the universe.”¹⁵ Theism offers answers that atheism leaves unexplored.
Anticipating Objection:
- Objection: “Atheism resolves questions about religion and existence.”
- Response: Atheism often leaves ultimate questions unanswered, whereas theism provides a coherent framework for understanding existence, purpose, and morality.
¹⁵ Alister McGrath, The Twilight of Atheism.
A Final Challenge to Misunderstandings About Atheism
Atheism, like any worldview, involves assumptions, commitments, and challenges. While it critiques religion, it must also address its own philosophical limitations. Could it be that atheism’s inability to answer ultimate questions points to the need for a transcendent source—one that theism offers in God?
Tom's Theology Blog 
Leave a comment