A Courtroom of 500 Witnesses?

Imagine a modern courtroom where 500 eyewitnesses testify under oath that they all saw the same miraculous event. The defense would collapse immediately—the sheer volume of corroborating testimony would be overwhelming. Yet, this is precisely what Paul claims in 1 Corinthians 15:6: that Jesus appeared to more than 500 people at once after His resurrection. Skeptics often dismiss this claim as unverifiable or legendary, but is that a reasonable position?

A closer examination of historical evidence, scholarly consensus, and cultural context reveals that the 500 witnesses provide compelling support for the resurrection claim. In this article, we will explore the credibility of Paul’s statement, the reliability of oral testimony in antiquity, and why skeptics must confront the burden of proof in dismissing such a claim.

---

Named Resurrection Witnesses

A common objection is that we do not have names for these 500 witnesses. However, several named individuals outside of the Twelve Apostles are recorded as having seen the risen Christ:

• Cleopas – One of the two disciples on the road to Emmaus, explicitly named in Luke 24:18.
• Matthias and Barsabbas (Justus) – Both were candidates to replace Judas, and their eligibility was based on their status as witnesses to the resurrection (Acts 1:21-23).
• James, the brother of Jesus – Paul directly names James as a resurrection witness (1 Corinthians 15:7), and Galatians 1:19 confirms his later leadership of the Jerusalem church.
• The Twelve Apostles – Paul includes them in his listing of resurrection appearances in 1 Corinthians 15.

Thus, while the full list of 500 is not provided, the argument that no witnesses were named is demonstrably false.

---

The Early Date of the 1 Corinthians 15 Creed

Scholars overwhelmingly agree that 1 Corinthians 15:3-7 is one of the earliest Christian creeds, dating to within 3-5 years of Jesus’ death. This is not merely an apologetic claim but is widely affirmed even by skeptical and atheist scholars:

• Gerd Lüdemann (atheist historian):“The elements in the tradition are to be dated to the first two years after the crucifixion of Jesus, not later than three years.”¹
• James D.G. Dunn:“This tradition, we can be entirely confident, was formulated as tradition within months of Jesus’ death.”²
• N.T. Wright:“This evidence is as strong as anything in ancient history. The idea that this was a later invention is simply implausible.”³
• Larry Hurtado (historian of early Christianity):“The creed in 1 Corinthians 15 is an extremely early tradition, predating Paul’s own writings and reflecting the core proclamation of the earliest followers of Jesus.”⁴

Even Bart Ehrman, often cited by skeptics, acknowledges that Paul did not invent this material but received it from an earlier source:

“This is material that Paul himself inherited. He says so. He received it. And he delivered it.”⁵

The creed’s early date means it originated within the very communities that would have been able to verify or refute its claims.

---

The 500 Witnesses in the Context of Other Resurrection Accounts

Paul’s statement about the 500 witnesses is not an isolated claim. It aligns with independent resurrection accounts in multiple sources:

• Matthew 28:16-20 – Jesus appears to a large gathering in Galilee. Some doubted, suggesting a sizable group beyond just the Eleven.
• Luke 24:33-51 – Jesus appears to a broad gathering in Jerusalem, eats with them, and invites them to witness His physical resurrection.
• Acts 1:3-12 – Jesus presents Himself alive over 40 days and teaches many people before His ascension.

These accounts collectively demonstrate that large-group appearances were not a single isolated claim but a repeated feature of resurrection testimonies.

---

How Could the Corinthians Verify the 500 Witnesses?

One objection is that Corinth was hundreds of miles away from Jerusalem, making verification impossible. However, there are two key reasons this is incorrect:

1. Corinth was a major trade hub – There was frequent travel between Corinth and Judea, especially among Jewish merchants and travelers. News of significant events would have easily spread.
2. The scattering of the early church – After Acts 8, persecution drove many Jewish Christians out of Jerusalem. Corinth, a diverse and economically significant city, would have been one of the places fleeing Christians traveled to. Some of the 500 witnesses may have ended up there, making firsthand verification possible.

If Paul’s claim had been false, critics could have easily exposed it. Instead, early Christianity continued to grow, suggesting that such challenges were not successful.

---

Final Challenge to Skeptics

If no such witnesses existed, Paul’s claim would have been publicly debunked, yet Christianity grew rapidly in the very places where these events were said to have occurred.

So here’s the challenge:

• If Paul was lying, why didn’t his critics call his bluff?
• If the 500 witnesses never existed, why didn’t early skeptics expose the deception?
• If skeptics demand more evidence, what exactly would be sufficient?

At some point, dismissing all available evidence ceases to be reasonable skepticism and becomes willful denial.

The 500 witnesses stand as one of the most compelling pieces of historical evidence for the resurrection. The question is: Are skeptics actually seeking the truth, or just avoiding it?

Footnotes

¹ Gerd Lüdemann, What Really Happened to Jesus?
² James D.G. Dunn, Jesus Remembered, 855.
³ N.T. Wright, The Resurrection of the Son of God, 319.
⁴ Larry Hurtado, Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity, 168.
⁵ Bart Ehrman, The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings.
⁶ Craig Keener, The Historical Jesus of the Gospels, 332.
⁷ Richard Bauckham, Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony, 308.
⁸ C.H. Dodd, The Apostolic Preaching and Its Developments, 31.
⁹ Eduard Schweizer, The Good News According to Paul, 103.