Why the Apostles’ Testimony Cannot Be Explained Away

This special blog is only available to subscribers and those who purchase my upcoming book, Mere Christianity for the Digital Age: Can Faith Survive the Internet? (available this fall from Trilogy Publishing)

“A man who says he saw something and is willing to die for it is not easily dismissed as a dreamer.”

— J.P. Moreland

In the history of religions, enthusiasm is common. So are visions, inner revelations, and sudden convictions. But Christianity didn’t begin with vague feelings or mystical insights. It began with something far more specific and dangerous: a public claim that Jesus of Nazareth had physically risen from the dead—and that multiple named eyewitnesses had seen Him.

This makes Christianity utterly unique.

Critics, both ancient and modern, have proposed that the apostles were mistaken, deluded, or misled. But a closer look at how Christianity began reveals something entirely different: the apostles were not religious enthusiasts caught in the thrill of new ideas. They were direct witnesses of something they said happened in real time and real space. They were not proclaiming a philosophy. They were proclaiming an event.

In this blog, we will explore why the apostles’ testimony cannot be reduced to later religious enthusiasm—and why the resurrection stands or falls not on general spirituality, but on specific, historical claims.

What Is a Religious Enthusiast?

A religious enthusiast is someone who experiences deep emotional or spiritual fervor, often convinced that they have encountered some higher truth or divine presence. This is not inherently bad. Many people have genuine spiritual experiences that change their lives. But enthusiasm alone does not verify historical events.

Throughout history, various individuals and movements have claimed revelations:

• Muhammad claimed to receive messages from the angel Gabriel.
• Joseph Smith claimed to receive golden plates from the angel Moroni.
• Some modern-day cult leaders claim divine authority through dreams or visions.

These claims are typically:

• Subjective (based on internal experiences).
• Unverifiable (no external evidence).
• Later (not tied to the immediate aftermath of a verifiable public event).

The apostles’ claims, by contrast, were:

• Objective (public encounters with a risen Jesus).
• Verifiable (openly proclaimed to hostile audiences).
• Immediate (proclaimed in the very city where Jesus was buried).

This distinction is vital.

Paul’s Creed: The Earliest Eyewitness Record

In 1 Corinthians 15:3–8, Paul records a creed he “received” and then passed on:

“That Christ died for our sins in accordance with the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day… and that he appeared to Cephas (Peter), then to the Twelve… then he appeared to more than 500 brothers at one time… then to James… then to all the apostles… and last of all… he appeared also to me.”

This creed is considered by virtually all scholars—conservative and critical alike—to be extremely early, dating to within 3–5 years of the crucifixion.¹

That matters. Because it means:

• The resurrection was not a later legend.
• The idea of appearances was not a slow development.
• Paul names living people who could be questioned.

This is not enthusiasm. This is eyewitness testimony.

The Apostles: From Fear to Proclamation

Consider the behavioral shift in the apostles:

• Before the resurrection:
  • They fled when Jesus was arrested (Mark 14:50).
  • Peter denied even knowing Him (Luke 22:57).
  • They hid in fear (John 20:19).
• After the resurrection:
  • They preached openly in Jerusalem.
  • Peter declared, “God has raised this Jesus to life, and we are all witnesses of it” (Acts 2:32).
  • They suffered beatings, imprisonment, and death rather than deny it.

This is not the arc of deluded visionaries. It is the pattern of people who believed they had seen something real.

As William Lane Craig notes, “Religious fanatics typically are made, not by events, but by doctrines. The disciples were transformed by what they believed they had seen.”²

Why Not Hallucinations?

Some skeptics argue that the apostles hallucinated the risen Christ. But hallucination theory fails on several fronts:

1. Hallucinations are private, not shared
   Psychological studies confirm that hallucinations are individual experiences. Group hallucinations are medically undocumented.³ Yet the Gospels and early tradition record multiple appearances to multiple people at multiple times.
2. The body was still missing
   Even if the apostles had hallucinated, the body would have still been in the tomb. Producing the corpse would have ended the movement instantly. But the tomb was empty, and that was never denied by the earliest critics.
3. The appearances had physical elements
   Jesus is recorded as eating (Luke 24:42–43), showing His wounds (John 20:27), and inviting touch (Matthew 28:9). These are not hallucination traits.
4. Paul was not in a suggestible state
   Paul was an opponent of Christianity. He had no psychological desire to see the risen Jesus. His conversion is thus particularly powerful evidence.

As psychologist Gary Collins wrote, “Hallucinations are individual occurrences. By their very nature, only one person can see a given hallucination at a time. They certainly aren’t something which can be seen by a group of people.”⁴

What About the Legend Theory?

Another attempt to explain the resurrection claims is the idea that the story of Jesus’ resurrection developed slowly over time, exaggerated by later Christians.

But again, the evidence is stacked against this:

• Paul’s creed (1 Corinthians 15) is extremely early.
• The preaching in Acts is public and immediate.
• The Gospels, written within the first century, reflect already established tradition.

Moreover, legends do not explain:

• The empty tomb.
• The willingness of eyewitnesses to die.
• The transformation of skeptics (like James and Paul).

As historian N.T. Wright states, “The early Christians did not invent the empty tomb and the meetings with the risen Jesus… nobody was expecting this kind of thing, no kind of conversion experience would have invented it, and to suggest otherwise is to stop doing history and enter fantasy.”⁵

Enthusiasts vs. Witnesses: A Comparative Chart

Characteristic	Religious Enthusiasts	Apostolic Eyewitnesses
Claim Type	Private revelation	Public physical event
Timing	Often years after event	Within days or weeks
Evidence Base	Inner conviction	Empty tomb + appearances
Response to Opposition	Withdrawal or reinterpretation	Bold proclamation under threat
Consistency of Message	Often changes or evolves	Fixed from earliest creed onward

This chart demonstrates that the apostles don’t fit the profile of enthusiasts. They match the profile of witnesses.

The Deaths of Eyewitnesses

If the resurrection were a delusion, we would expect eventual recanting. But that is not what history records.

• Peter was crucified.
• Paul was beheaded.
• James, the brother of Jesus, was stoned.
• Andrew was executed in Patras.
• Thomas was killed in India.
• Others died scattered across the empire.

None denied what they had seen. As Sean McDowell summarizes, “The apostles’ willingness to suffer and die for their beliefs suggests they were sincere… Liars make poor martyrs.”⁶

The Weight of Testimony

Christianity did not begin with religious enthusiasm. It began with eyewitness proclamation—that Jesus died, was buried, and rose again.

This was not a comforting myth. It was a dangerous claim. It got people killed. And yet it spread rapidly, in the very places it could have been most easily disproven.

The apostles were not spiritual gurus passing along mystical ideas. They were fishermen, tax collectors, and skeptics who had seen something they could not deny. Something that changed them forever.

And something that still changes lives today.

---

Footnotes

¹ Gary Habermas and Michael Licona, The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Grand Rapids: Kregel, 2004).
² William Lane Craig, Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics, 3rd ed. (Wheaton: Crossway, 2008).
³ Paul L. Maeder, “Group Hallucinations and Mass Psychogenic Illness,” Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 171, no. 7 (1983).
⁴ Gary R. Collins, quoted in Lee Strobel, The Case for Christ (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1998).
⁵ N.T. Wright, The Resurrection of the Son of God (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2003), 707.
⁶ Sean McDowell, The Fate of the Apostles: Examining the Martyrdom Accounts of the Closest Followers of Jesus(New York: Routledge, 2016).