What Dark Matter Teaches Us About Believing in God
“For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made.”
— Romans 1:20
We live in a world full of unseen realities. From the air we breathe to the gravitational pull anchoring our feet to the earth, some of the most important forces in the universe operate invisibly. And yet, we trust them because we see their effects. In the realm of science, perhaps the most profound example of this is dark matter—a mysterious substance that no one has ever seen, yet nearly every astrophysicist believes in. Why? Because the universe doesn’t make sense without it.
This raises a fascinating question: If we accept the existence of dark matter on rational grounds—even though it’s never been directly observed—can we consistently reject belief in God for being unseen? In this blog, we’ll explore how belief in dark matter and belief in God, while not the same, follow a similar logic. And we’ll argue that accepting one while dismissing the other may reveal more about our philosophical commitments than our reasoning.
What Is Dark Matter?
Dark matter is one of the greatest mysteries in modern physics. It doesn’t emit light, reflect it, or interact with electromagnetic forces the way ordinary matter does. In fact, we have never directly observed dark matter. So why do scientists believe it exists?
Because without it, the universe behaves in ways that don’t make sense.
Astronomers first suspected the presence of dark matter when they observed the rotation curves of galaxies. According to Newtonian physics, stars farther from the center of a galaxy should orbit more slowly, just as planets farther from the sun do. But observations revealed that stars on the outer edges of galaxies move just as quickly as those near the center. This defies explanation—unless an unseen mass is exerting additional gravitational force.
That unseen mass is what we call dark matter.
The case doesn’t stop there. Gravitational lensing—where light from distant galaxies is bent as it passes through other galaxy clusters—shows that there’s more mass in the universe than we can see. The Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), the afterglow of the Big Bang, also contains fluctuations that make sense only if dark matter is factored in.
Today, dark matter is a pillar of the standard model of cosmology (known as ΛCDM). It is estimated to make up about 27% of the universe—compared to just 5% for normal, visible matter.
Still, no one has ever seen it. No telescope has captured it. No lab has isolated it.
And yet, belief in dark matter is not dismissed as superstition. Why? Because its existence is the best explanation for the effects we observe.
What Is God (Philosophically Speaking)?
Just as physicists infer the existence of dark matter from its observable effects, many philosophers and theologians argue for the existence of God from what we observe in the universe. But unlike dark matter—which would be another component of the physical cosmos—God is understood to be outside of and greater than the cosmos. He is not merely another “thing” in the universe, but rather the necessary foundation for everything that exists.
Philosophically speaking, God is defined as:
- Eternal (without beginning or end),
- Necessary (cannot not exist),
- Immaterial (not composed of physical matter),
- All-powerful, All-knowing, and Personal.
This concept of God is not merely a leap of faith—it is the logical conclusion of multiple lines of philosophical reasoning.
One of the most compelling is the Cosmological Argument, which reasons that everything that begins to exist has a cause. Since the universe began to exist, it must have a cause beyond itself. That cause must be spaceless, timeless, and immaterial—fitting the description of God.
Another line of reasoning is the Moral Argument: If objective moral values exist (and most people live as if they do), then there must be a transcendent source of those values. Evolution may explain behavior, but it cannot explain why something is actually right or wrong—why, for example, torturing children is objectively evil, regardless of opinion.
The Teleological Argument points to the fine-tuning of the universe for life. The fundamental constants of nature fall within extraordinarily narrow ranges. Slight changes would make life impossible. This apparent design suggests a Designer.
All of these arguments are inferences—not unlike the inference to dark matter. We may not “see” God with our eyes, but we see His fingerprints in the very fabric of reality.
In short, belief in God is based on reason. Just as scientists use logical inference to believe in unseen matter, Christians and theists use logical inference to believe in an unseen Creator.
The Logical Parallel
Now that we’ve examined both dark matter and the philosophical case for God, it’s time to draw the parallel. Though they are clearly not the same type of entity—one physical, the other metaphysical—they share a profound similarity: both are invisible, and both are believed in based on the effects they produce.
Let’s be clear: belief in dark matter is not blind. It’s based on observed phenomena that cry out for an explanation. Likewise, belief in God is not blind. It arises from the observable features of existence—causality, design, morality, rationality, beauty, and even the universal human longing for meaning.
Both beliefs are inferred:
- We infer dark matter from galactic rotation, lensing, and background radiation.
- We infer God from the existence of the universe, the fine-tuning of physical laws, moral experience, and the coherence of rational thought.
This is what philosophers call inference to the best explanation.
You don’t need to see something directly to believe in it. You only need good reason to believe it explains what you dosee. By this logic, dark matter is accepted, even celebrated. But oddly, some reject God for being “unseen.”
Why the inconsistency?
The Difference Between the Two
Of course, God is not the same kind of entity as dark matter. That’s important to stress. Dark matter is hypothesized to be part of the created universe—it would be made of particles, bound by gravity, subject to natural law.
God, on the other hand, is by definition transcendent. He is not a “thing” within the universe but the ground of all being—the One who brought the universe into existence.
So while both are unseen, the difference lies in category, not credibility.
Still, if our reasoning process justifies belief in one, it cannot arbitrarily exclude the other simply because it does not conform to materialist assumptions. If explanatory power is the gold standard, then belief in God is as intellectually serious as belief in dark matter.
We are not saying “God is dark matter,” nor even that “dark matter proves God.” We are saying this: if you accept dark matter because of what it explains, then it is intellectually dishonest to reject God merely because He is invisible.
The Inconsistency of Skepticism
Modern skepticism often claims: “I only believe in what I can see.” But this principle is rarely applied consistently.
No one has seen an electron, yet no one doubts its existence. We’ve never observed consciousness as a physical object, yet no one denies they’re aware. We trust in gravity, quantum fields, subatomic particles, and even multiverse theories—all of which rely heavily on indirect evidence, inference, and models.
So why is God uniquely excluded from this allowance?
The real issue is often not evidence—but worldview. If someone is committed to naturalism, then God cannot exist—not because of lack of evidence, but because of a prior commitment to a worldview that excludes Him. But that’s not a scientific objection—it’s a philosophical one.
Atheists may pride themselves on skepticism, but intellectual honesty requires being skeptical of our skepticism, too.
From Unseen to Known
Though we cannot see dark matter directly, we believe in it because its effects are real. The same can be said of God.
In fact, for many people, belief in God has moved beyond logical inference to experiential knowledge—a relationship, a transformation, a sense of His presence. While this cannot be tested in a laboratory, it is no less real. Countless lives have been radically changed not by an idea, but by the living God.
C.S. Lewis put it well: “I believe in Christianity as I believe that the sun has risen: not only because I see it, but because by it I see everything else.”
Belief in God brings coherence to everything else—our origin, our purpose, our sense of right and wrong, and our hunger for meaning. Like dark matter, He explains what we cannot otherwise explain. Unlike dark matter, He also invites us to know Him personally.
Conclusion
We began with a simple question: If you believe in dark matter—something unseen but inferred—can you logically reject belief in God for being unseen?
The answer is: not if you care about consistency.
Belief in dark matter is based on explanatory necessity. So is belief in God. Both are supported by strong, indirect evidence. Both are unseen but make sense of what is seen. And yet, many who accept one dismiss the other—not for rational reasons, but for philosophical ones.
If you trust science to lead you to unseen truths, consider that the same logic may be pointing you beyond the physical—to the One who made it all.
The heavens declare the glory of God, and the unseen things of God are clearly seen—if we have eyes to see them.
Tom's Theology Blog 
Leave a comment