“Many Jews of the first century believed that they were living at the climax of Israel’s history and that the long-awaited redemption was near.” – N. T. Wright, Jesus and the Victory of God
We often approach the Christmas story as if it floats above history, detached from time, place, and culture. Over the years, debates have arisen about whether Jesus was born in the winter, in the fall, or even in the spring. Yet when the story is read through Jewish eyes, many of those questions begin to answer themselves. The Gospels were written in a world where details mattered, where seasons, locations, and patterns carried meaning. The original Jewish readers did not need explanatory footnotes. They knew how to read the signs.
“Shepherds in Palestine followed seasonal patterns, grazing their flocks in open pasture during the dry season and keeping them closer to settlements during the colder, wetter months.” – James C. VanderKam, An Introduction to Early Judaism
One of those signs appears quietly in Luke’s mention of shepherds. Modern readers often imagine shepherds wandering the open wilderness year-round, but first-century Jews knew that shepherding followed the seasons. During warmer months, flocks were taken farther out into open grazing land. During colder months, they were kept closer to towns for shelter and protection. Luke does not place the shepherds deep in the wilderness but near Bethlehem itself. To a Jewish reader, this detail would naturally suggest cooler weather, not the heat of summer. The text does not announce a season, but it signals one.
“The festival of Dedication was established to commemorate the rededication of the Temple after its profanation, and it was celebrated with the lighting of lamps as a symbol of divine deliverance.” – 1 Maccabees 4:56–59 (summary reflected in the text’s description of the feast)
That seasonal signal becomes even more meaningful when placed alongside the Jewish calendar. Winter in Judea coincides with Hanukkah, the Feast of Dedication, a time when Israel remembered oppression under foreign rule, deliverance through God’s intervention, and the miracle of light overcoming darkness. Hanukkah was not merely a celebration of the past; it was a reminder that God acts in history to preserve His people. Light stood at the center of that memory. Against that backdrop, Luke tells us that a child is born, and Matthew reminds us of Isaiah’s words: “The people dwelling in darkness have seen a great light” (Matthew 4:16). To Jewish readers, the symbolism would have been unmistakable. God was sending His light into the world once again.
The language of light is deeply rooted in Israel’s Scriptures. Light is not merely illumination; it is revelation, the presence of God breaking into human history. Hanukkah celebrated remembered light. The birth of Jesus announced living light. The timing would not have distracted a Jewish reader. It would have intensified the meaning.
“In Jewish literature, angels typically appear at moments of crisis or transition, signaling divine intervention in human affairs.” – Michael S. Heiser, The Unseen Realm
Angelic appearances reinforce this sense of divine action. In Israel’s Scriptures, angels do not appear casually. They appear at moments of transition, covenantal fulfillment, and decisive movement by God. When Israel stood on the edge of the Promised Land, Joshua encountered the commander of the army of the LORD, who declared God’s presence and authority over what was about to unfold (Joshua 5:13–15). That moment marked the transition from promise to fulfillment. Luke draws on the same pattern. When angels appear to shepherds near Bethlehem, they signal another threshold moment in Israel’s story.
The message itself is saturated with Jewish meaning. “And the angel said to them, ‘Fear not, for behold, I bring you good news of great joy that will be for all the people’” (Luke 2:10). For Jewish readers, “all the people” would first mean Israel. The angels then announce, “For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord” (Luke 2:11). Each title carries covenantal weight. Savior recalls God’s deliverance in the Exodus and the time of the judges. Christ means Messiah, the anointed king of Israel. Lord is a title already saturated with divine authority in Israel’s Scriptures. The angels are not inventing a new theology. They are announcing that Israel’s long-awaited hope has arrived.
Notably, this angelic announcement stands in contrast to earlier moments in Israel’s history. When angels appeared to Joshua, they announced conquest and judgment. Here, they announce peace. Luke records that the heavenly host praises God, saying, “Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace among those with whom he is pleased” (Luke 2:14). God is acting again, but not through the sword. The fulfillment this time comes through a child.
“The interpretation of Daniel’s visions led many Jews to believe that the present age was nearing its end and that God was about to intervene decisively in history.” – John J. Collins, The Scepter and the Star
The star that appears in Matthew’s account fits seamlessly into this Jewish framework. Numbers speaks of a star rising out of Jacob, imagery long associated with messianic expectation (Numbers 24:17). By the Second Temple period, this expectation had intensified. Jewish interpreters drew on the book of Daniel to suggest that the age of Messiah was approaching. This belief did not originate with Christians (Daniel 9:24–26). It appears throughout Second Temple writings, where there is a growing sense that history was nearing a decisive turning point.
“There was a firm persuasion that at this very time the East was to grow powerful, and rulers coming from Judea were to acquire universal empire.” – Tacitus, Histories 5.13
This sense of approaching fulfillment is not inferred retrospectively from the Gospels but is well attested within Jewish sources themselves. Texts from the Dead Sea Scrolls speak openly of what would occur when the Messiah came, describing healing, resurrection, and good news for the poor, language drawn directly from Isaiah and treated as imminent rather than distant (4Q521, often called the Messianic Apocalypse). Other Second Temple writings refer matter-of-factly to awaiting the coming of the Messiah of Israel, suggesting expectation rather than abstraction (Damascus Document, CD 12:23–13:1). Even Jewish historians of the first century acknowledged that many believed their sacred writings pointed to a ruler arising from Judea in their own time (Josephus, Jewish War 6.312–313). Remarkably, Roman historians confirm the same perception, noting a widespread conviction throughout the East that the moment foretold in Jewish Scripture was at hand (Tacitus, Histories 5.13; Suetonius, Vespasian 4.5). Across diverse Jewish communities, interpretations of Daniel and the prophets had produced a shared sense that history was moving toward a decisive intervention by God. When Matthew tells of a star announcing the birth of a king, Jewish readers were already primed by their Scriptures and their world to believe that such signs marked the arrival of the long-awaited Messiah.
“The heavens and the earth will listen to His Messiah… He will heal the wounded, revive the dead, and proclaim good news to the poor.” – Dead Sea Scrolls, 4Q521 (Messianic Apocalypse)
This helps explain the arrival of the Magi. These men from the East were not intruding into a foreign story. Jewish communities had lived in Babylon and Persia since the exile. The book of Daniel itself is set in that world, and Daniel is portrayed as a figure of wisdom among the learned men of the East. The idea that Gentile scholars, familiar with Jewish texts and watching the heavens, might recognize signs connected to Israel’s Messiah would not have been implausible. It would have been unsettling, but intelligible. The nations were beginning to see what Israel had been promised.
“The donkey was the most common animal used for travel in Palestine, particularly for women and families, owing to its steadiness and suitability for long journeys.” – Joachim Jeremias, Jerusalem in the Time of Jesus
Even the journey of Mary and Joseph carries symbolic weight. Scripture does not explicitly state that Mary rode a donkey, yet Jewish readers would have naturally envisioned such an arrangement. Donkeys were common for travel, especially for women, and they already carried messianic associations through passages like Zechariah’s vision of Israel’s king coming humbly, riding on a donkey. Whether or not Luke intended the image explicitly, it fits the pattern of humility and fulfillment woven throughout the narrative. God’s Messiah does not arrive as Rome defines power.
Taken together, these details reveal how the Christmas story was meant to be heard. It was not written to create sentimentality or to detach Jesus from Israel’s story. It was written so that Jews steeped in Scripture, living under oppression, and longing for deliverance might recognize that God had acted. The season, the light, the angels, the shepherds, the star, and the timing all converge to say the same thing. Israel’s Messiah has come, and He has come exactly when and how God promised.
When we recover this Jewish way of seeing Christmas, the story does not lose its beauty. It gains depth. Christmas is not merely the celebration of a birth. It is the announcement that Israel’s long night is giving way to dawn.
The people who walked in darkness
have seen a great light;
those who dwelt in a land of deep darkness,
on them has light shone. . .
. . . For to us a child is born,
to us a son is given;
and the government shall be upon his shoulder,
and his name shall be called
Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God,
Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.
Of the increase of his government and of peace
there will be no end,
on the throne of David and over his kingdom,
to establish it and to uphold it
with justice and with righteousness
from this time forth and forevermore.
The zeal of the LORD of hosts will do this.
– Isaiah 9:2, 6–7
Tom's Theology Blog 
Leave a comment