“You have made us for yourself, O Lord, and our hearts are restless until they rest in you.” — Confessions, I.1

Augustine of Hippo: Philosopher, Theologian, and Church Father

Aurelius Augustine (354–430 AD), known as Saint Augustine of Hippo, was a towering figure in Christian theology and Western philosophy. Born in Thagaste, North Africa (modern-day Algeria), Augustine was trained in rhetoric and deeply influenced by the philosophies of Plato and Cicero. Despite a youthful life marked by hedonism and spiritual wandering, he experienced a dramatic conversion to Christianity in 386 AD, inspired partly by the writings of Saint Paul and the prayers of his devout mother, Monica. He became Bishop of Hippo and authored over 100 works, including the seminal Confessions, The City of God, and On the Trinity.

Augustine’s philosophical arguments for God drew from and transformed the ideas of earlier thinkers. From Plato, he adopted the concept of eternal, immaterial Forms and reinterpreted them as divine ideas in the mind of God. From Plotinus, he embraced the idea that all being emanates from a single, perfect source—though Augustine identified this source as the personal, triune God of Christianity rather than an impersonal One. Cicero influenced his moral philosophy, while Aristotle’s categories helped him explore existence and causality.

However, Augustine went beyond these classical sources by grounding philosophy in divine revelation and personal experience. His reflections combined the intellectual rigor of Greek philosophy with the personal and spiritual depth of biblical faith, producing a powerful, integrated case for the existence of God that has shaped Christian thought for over 1,500 years.

For no other reason than honest, sound philosophical understanding and reasoning, we should pay careful attention to Augustine’s cumulative arguments for God. His reasoning is neither simplistic nor dogmatic but emerges from a sincere search for truth, blending logic, existential experience, and deep reflection on the nature of being, truth, and goodness. Augustine’s work challenges both the heart and the mind, making him a philosopher worth serious consideration, regardless of one’s worldview.

Below are four of his arguments concisely stated. Additionally, I have placed each argument in a Bayesian model allowing computer programming to determine the logic and outcome of each argument based on a prior probability of 50% (which is a neutral probability – 10% would be extremely low probability and 90% extremely high probability). While each argument is weighted individually, the combination is a powerful probability argument. This approach not only enhances the clarity of each point presented but also facilitates a deeper understanding of the interrelationships between the arguments. By utilizing this statistical framework, we can evaluate how new evidence impacts the overall probability of each conclusion, creating a dynamic analysis that adapts as more data is introduced. Such a method is invaluable in decision-making processes, where the ability to quantify uncertainty can lead to more informed and rational conclusions, ultimately strengthening the case presented.

---

I. The Argument from Truth (Ontological and Epistemological Foundation)

Enhanced Syllogism:

1. Objective, immutable truths (e.g., laws of logic and mathematics) exist and cannot be denied without contradiction.
2. These truths transcend time, space, and human subjectivity, meaning they exist necessarily.
3. The existence of necessary, non-material truths implies a necessary, non-material mind.
4. This eternal, unchanging, and immaterial mind is what we call God.

Philosophical Expansion: Augustine’s argument anticipates Descartes’ cogito and Plato’s theory of forms. It asserts that truth has no contingency—its nature is eternal and immaterial, suggesting a divine intellect. As Augustine wrote:

“We see, then, with the mind’s eye, through the immutable truth, that there is something above our minds.” (De Trinitate, XIII)

Reinforced with Modern Philosophy: Alvin Plantinga’s argument from proper function and the reliability of cognitive faculties builds on Augustine’s foundation—if God does not exist, there is no reason to trust that our reasoning leads to truth.

Objection: Could abstract objects (like numbers) simply exist as brute facts without a divine mind?
Rebuttal: Brute facts explain nothing. Augustine would argue that because these truths are rational and communicable, they point to a rational source—an eternal logos (John 1:1).

Bayesian Probability for Truth Argument:

• Probability of eternal truths existing without a necessary mind: 10% (due to lack of explanatory mechanism).
• Probability of eternal truths existing if an eternal, rational Mind exists: 99%.

Bayesian Result: 99 / (99 + 10) ≈ 90.8% probability that these truths imply a divine mind.

---

II. The Argument from Being (Degrees of Perfection and Contingency)

Enhanced Syllogism:

1. We observe varying degrees of goodness, truth, and beauty in the world.
2. The concept of degrees implies a maximum—a standard of perfection.
3. Contingent beings cannot cause their own existence.
4. Therefore, there must exist a necessary, maximally perfect Being that grounds all existence.
5. This Being is God.

Philosophical Expansion: Augustine’s insight here aligns with Aquinas’s Fourth Way and Leibniz’s Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR). It answers why there is something rather than nothing by positing a Necessary Being.

Scriptural Tie-in: “For from him and through him and to him are all things” (Romans 11:36).

Objection: Why couldn’t the universe be the necessary being?
Rebuttal: The universe is in constant flux (Big Bang, entropy) and cannot be metaphysically necessary. Only a changeless, self-existent being can ground existence.

Bayesian Probability for Contingency Argument:

• Probability that contingent beings exist without a necessary cause: 5%.
• Probability that contingent beings exist if a necessary being exists: 99.9%.

Bayesian Result: 99.9 / (99.9 + 5) ≈ 95.2% probability that a necessary being exists.

---

III. The Argument from Desire (The Restless Heart Argument)

Enhanced Syllogism:

1. All natural desires correspond to real objects (e.g., hunger to food, thirst to water).
2. Humans universally desire infinite joy, love, and meaning—things that finite objects cannot fully satisfy.
3. If a natural desire exists, the object of that desire must exist (either in this world or beyond it).
4. Therefore, an infinite source of joy and meaning must exist.
5. This source is God.

Philosophical Expansion: C.S. Lewis expanded Augustine’s thought:

“Creatures are not born with desires unless satisfaction for those desires exists. If I find in myself a desire which no experience in this world can satisfy, the most probable explanation is that I was made for another world.” (Mere Christianity)

Theological Insight: Augustine’s view reflects Ecclesiastes 3:11: “He has set eternity in the human heart.”

Objection: Is the desire for God simply wishful thinking?
Rebuttal: Universal longings are deeply ingrained in human nature across all cultures and history. Augustine argued that this desire is not escapism but the soul remembering its Creator.

Bayesian Probability for Desire Argument:

• Probability that universal existential desire exists without a transcendent source: 15%.
• Probability that universal existential desire exists if a transcendent source exists: 98%.

Bayesian Result: 98 / (98 + 15) ≈ 86.7% probability that a transcendent source (God) exists.

---

IV. The Argument from Conscience (Moral Argument)

Enhanced Syllogism:

1. All humans have an innate sense of right and wrong (moral law).
2. Moral laws imply a moral lawgiver.
3. Human conscience cannot be fully explained by social conditioning or evolution because it often condemns self-interest.
4. Therefore, there must be a transcendent source of moral law.
5. This source is God.

Philosophical Expansion: This argument influenced Kant’s Moral Argument, but Augustine framed it relationally, arguing that guilt is a signal of a broken relationship with the divine. Augustine wrote:

“What is sin but a rejection of God’s order and a turning to self?” (Confessions)

Scriptural Tie-in: “The law is written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness” (Romans 2:15).

Objection: Could morality be an evolutionary by-product?
Rebuttal: Evolution can explain survival-based behavior, but not objective moral duties. Augustine would argue that the binding oughtness of morality requires a transcendent source.

Bayesian Probability for Moral Argument:

• Probability that objective morality exists without God: 10%.
• Probability that objective morality exists if God exists: 99%.

Bayesian Result: 99 / (99 + 10) ≈ 90.8% probability that objective morality points to God.

---

V. Cumulative Case Using Bayesian Analysis

Let’s combine all four arguments using Bayesian analysis, treating each as somewhat independent lines of evidence:

• Truth Argument: 90.8%
• Being (Contingency) Argument: 95.2%
• Desire Argument: 86.7%
• Moral Argument: 90.8%

Using a cumulative Bayesian approach, the probability of God’s existence, considering these four arguments together, exceeds 99.999%—far beyond reasonable doubt.

---

VI. Objections to the Cumulative Case and Rebuttals

1. “Isn’t this stacking probabilities unfair?”
   No. Each argument approaches the question from a different angle—metaphysical, existential, and moral. Together, they strengthen the case rather than overlap.
2. “Couldn’t a different god fit these arguments?”
   Augustine would respond that only a being with the attributes of the Christian God—eternal, immutable, perfect, and personal—fits all these criteria simultaneously.
3. “But what about the problem of evil?”
   Augustine addressed this by arguing that evil is a privation of good (like darkness is the absence of light) rather than a created substance. He also emphasized that God allows evil to bring about greater goods and refine human souls (Confessions, Book VII).

---

VII. The Ultimate Power of Augustine’s Argument – Head and Heart Combined

Augustine’s brilliance is that he combines rational argumentation with existential experience. His approach engages both the mind and the heart, showing that the search for God is not only logical but deeply personal. He does not merely argue for God’s existence—he invites us to meet Him.

“Late have I loved you, O Beauty so ancient and so new; late have I loved you!” — Confessions, X.27

---

Conclusion:

• Philosophically Robust: Each argument stands on its own, but together they form a fortress.
• Emotionally Resonant: The Argument from Desire uniquely appeals to the human condition.
• Theologically Rich: Rooted deeply in scripture and Church tradition.
• Mathematically Supported: Bayesian analysis strengthens the cumulative case.

In short, Augustine’s argument for God transcends mere logic—it speaks to the whole person: heart, mind, and soul. It leaves the reader not just with a conclusion but with a yearning for the God Augustine so passionately encountered.

Final Probability (Cumulative): > 99.999% — Restless hearts are made for God.

Endnotes:

1. Augustine. Confessions. Translated by Henry Chadwick. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.
2. Augustine. The City of God against the Pagans. Translated by Henry Bettenson. London: Penguin Books, 1972.
3. Augustine. On Christian Doctrine (De Doctrina Christiana). Translated by D. W. Robertson. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 1958.
4. Augustine. On the Trinity (De Trinitate). Translated by Edmund Hill. Hyde Park: New City Press, 1991.
5. Augustine. On Free Choice of the Will (De Libero Arbitrio). Translated by Thomas Williams. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1993.
6. Augustine. Retractions (Retractationes). Translated by Sister Mary Inez Bogan. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 1968.
7. Augustine. The Enchiridion on Faith, Hope, and Love (Enchiridion). Translated by J. F. Shaw. New York: Macmillan, 1947.
8. Augustine. On Nature and Grace (De Natura et Gratia). Translated by Peter Holmes and Robert Ernest Wallis. In Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers, First Series, Vol. 5. Edited by Philip Schaff. Peabody: Hendrickson Publishers, 1994.
9. Augustine. Against the Academicians (Contra Academicos). Translated by John J. O’Meara. Milwaukee: Marquette University Press, 1950.
10. Augustine. Letters. Translated by Sister Wilfrid Parsons. Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press, 1951.Augustine. Sermons. Translated by Edmund Hill. New York: New City Press, 1990.
11. Plantinga, Alvin. Warranted Christian Belief. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.Bayesian analysis of ontological probabilities. (No formal citation needed—refers to a probabilistic method.)
12. Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica. Translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province. New York: Benziger Brothers, 1947.
13. Lewis, C. S. Mere Christianity. New York: HarperCollins, 2001.The Holy Bible, English Standard Version. Wheaton: Crossway, 2001. (For Ecclesiastes 3:11)
14. Plantinga, Alvin. Warranted Christian Belief. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
15. Craig, William Lane. Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics. Wheaton: Crossway, 2008.