Deuteronomy 7:1–6 in Ancient Jewish Eyes

Facing a Difficult Command

Deuteronomy 7 is one of those passages that challenges modern readers. God commands the Israelites to “complete destruction” (some read “utterly destroy”) seven Canaanite nations — to make no treaty, show no mercy, and tear down their altars. Critics often point to texts like this as proof that the God of the Old Testament is cruel or morally inconsistent.

But that’s because we tend to read it through modern eyes as opposed to how the original readers would have understood it. To understand what it meant then, we must read it through ancient Jewish eyes — through a worldview where the material and spiritual were inseparable. In that world, divine beings ruled territories, idols were not mere art but spiritual gateways, and wars were not just about land — they were about which god reigned over that land (see my blog “One God Further?“).

The command in Deuteronomy 7 wasn’t random violence; it was about purging idolatry and reclaiming sacred space. Ancient Israel believed that Yahweh’s war against Canaan was part of a much larger, unseen conflict — one that stretched back to the rebellion of divine beings and the corruption of the earth (See: “Was God Unjust in Sending the Flood” and “Which Fall?“).

Remembering the Spies and the Giants

Before we can understand Deuteronomy 7, we need to remember what happened when Israel first saw the land. Moses sent twelve spies to scout Canaan. When they returned, ten of them reported that the land was filled with fortified cities and terrifying inhabitants. “We saw the Nephilim there — the sons of Anak, who come from the Nephilim — and we seemed like grasshoppers in our own eyes.”¹

Only Joshua and Caleb believed that God would fight for them.² Their trust stood in contrast to the fear of the others, whose report spread panic throughout the camp. As a result, Israel refused to enter, and God sentenced that generation to wander for forty years.

That event shaped Israel’s imagination. The land of Canaan wasn’t just “foreign territory”; it was seen as a haunted land, inhabited by the descendants of ancient giants — lineages believed to trace back to the mysterious figures of Genesis 6: the Nephilim, born from the union of “sons of God” (בְּנֵי הָאֱלֹהִים
Bene ha-Elohim, fallen angels) and human women.³

So when Moses later commanded Israel to “devote them to destruction” (וְהַחֲרַמְתָּם ve·ha·ḥăram·tām or ḥērem), those words echoed against the memory of that earlier fear — and the conviction that Yahweh Himself was now going to wage war against those dark spiritual powers that had once terrified the nation.

What Ḥērem Meant: Devotion, Not Genocide

The Hebrew word translated “utterly destroy” is ḥērem. It doesn’t mean “massacre” in the modern sense; it means to devote something entirely to God. If the text meant to slaughter or massacre it would have used שָׁמַד / הִשְׁמִיד (to exterminate) or הָרַג / תַּהַרְגוּ (to kill/put to death). In war, וְהַחֲרַמְתָּם (ḥērem) meant that a city or people was placed under the divine ban — set apart as belonging wholly to God, and therefore removed from ordinary human use.

Israel was not permitted to plunder ḥērem cities. There were to be no treaties, no intermarriage, and no compromise. Everything that represented rival worship — altars, idols, sacred poles — was to be burned or broken. The focus wasn’t ethnic annihilation; it was religious purification.⁴

Dr. K. Lawson Younger, who studied ancient Near Eastern war texts, showed that phrases like “leave alive nothing that breathes” were common hyperbolic idioms in military language.⁵ Even Israel’s own story shows that not all the Canaanites were wiped out; many remained, and Israel lived among them.⁶

In short, ḥērem language was covenantal and ritual, not genocidal. It symbolized that Yahweh alone was king in the land.

The Divine Council and the Territorial Gods

Ancient Jews believed that the nations of the world were not just political entities but spiritual territories. Deuteronomy 32:8–9 says that when the Most High divided humanity, “He fixed the borders of the peoples according to the number of the sons of God, but the LORD’s portion is His people, Jacob His allotted inheritance.”⁷

That verse, preserved in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Greek Septuagint, reflects a worldview where God assigned nations to members of His heavenly council — divine beings who later rebelled and accepted worship for themselves. Psalm 82 describes God judging those lesser “gods” for corrupting justice among the nations.

Dr. Michael Heiser called this the Divine Council worldview — the idea that spiritual rulers stand behind earthly powers.⁸ When Yahweh commands Israel to destroy Canaanite altars, it’s not merely religious intolerance; it’s cosmic warfare. Each idol, shrine, or “high place” represents a rival claim to the land.

As Heiser wrote,

“The conquest was not about human ethnic cleansing but about Yahweh taking back His turf from supernatural usurpers.”⁹

The Giants of Canaan: The Rephaim and Anakim

The Torah doesn’t just describe ordinary enemies. It repeatedly names specific groups — the Anakim, Rephaim, and Emim — as giant clans occupying Canaan.ⁱ⁰ One king, Og of Bashan, is said to have a bed over thirteen feet long.ⁱ¹ Bashan itself was remembered as “the land of the Rephaim,” and in ancient Ugaritic texts it was associated with the underworld.

By the Second Temple period, Jewish writers like those of 1 Enoch and Jubilees connected these giants to the Nephilim of Genesis 6. The “sons of God” who rebelled against heaven were believed to have fathered a hybrid race whose violence and corruption filled the earth before the Flood — and whose spirits, once destroyed, became the demonic powers that plagued humanity.ⁱ²

In that worldview, certain regions of Canaan — especially Bashan and Mount Hermon (where in Matthew 16:18 Jesus says the “gates of hell” would not prevail) — weren’t just enemy territory; they were contaminated space. When God told Israel to destroy those inhabitants, ancient Jews would have understood it as purging a demonic foothold from the land.ⁱ³

The Conquest as Cosmic Reclamation

When Deuteronomy 7 commands total devotion to God, it’s framed within a larger story: Yahweh reclaiming His inheritance. According to the same Deuteronomic theology, after Babel humanity was scattered and handed over to lesser divine beings. But Israel was Yahweh’s direct portion — His own nation.

Every battle in Canaan symbolized a spiritual eviction. Each toppled altar was a dethroned god. When Israel crossed the Jordan, they weren’t just crossing geography; they were crossing cosmic boundaries.

Heiser often pointed out that the conquest specifically targets regions linked to giant lineages — the very places Israel once feared.ⁱ⁴ In other words, God was leading His people back into the land they had once refused to enter because of the giants, but this time the outcome would be different: Yahweh Himself would fight for them.

“Little by Little”: Divine Restraint and Moral Purpose

Even at its most severe, Deuteronomy tempers the command with mercy and patience: “The LORD your God will clear away these nations before you little by little. You will not be able to make an end of them at once.”ⁱ⁵

That verse reminds us that this wasn’t a blind rampage. It was a measured judgment, stretched out over time for both practical and moral reasons. The conquest was meant to purge idolatry — not to indulge Israel’s aggression.

Paul Copan writes that these commands “were judicial acts, not racial acts.” They reflected God’s right to judge moral corruption but were bound to a specific covenant context.ⁱ⁶ Even Rahab and the Gibeonites show that those who turned to Yahweh could find mercy.

Ancient Israel would have seen the conquest as holy war — but holy because it was God’s war, not theirs.

Second Temple Judaism: The Cosmic War Expands

By the time of Jesus, Jewish thought had expanded this Deuteronomic vision into full apocalyptic theology. Books like 1 Enoch, Jubilees, and The Book of Giants describe the ongoing struggle between heavenly and demonic powers. The old wars of Joshua and Moses were seen as preludes to a final battle between God and the forces of chaos.ⁱ⁷

Mount Hermon — where the Watchers (fallen angels) were said to have descended — became symbolic of rebellion. Bashan, the home of Og, was remembered as “the gates of hell.” Jesus’ transfiguration near that same region, and His statement in Matthew 16 that “the gates of Hades shall not prevail,” would have echoed that ancient geography in the minds of Jewish hearers.

Heiser called this “Reversing Hermon” — Christ undoing the rebellion of the Watchers and reclaiming the world from demonic rule.ⁱ⁸

Reading Deuteronomy 7 through Ancient Eyes

For ancient Israel, Deuteronomy 7 wasn’t about cruelty; it was about consecration.

• Holy devotion: Ḥērem marked a thing as belonging wholly to God.
• Sacred space: Canaan was being cleansed to host God’s presence.
• Cosmic warfare: Each Canaanite god dethroned, each idol destroyed, signaled Yahweh’s victory.
• Moral focus: The targets were systems of idolatry, not ethnic identity.
• Measured justice: It happened “little by little,” not in blind rage.

Once we step into that worldview, the passage becomes less about annihilation and more about God reclaiming creation from spiritual corruption.

From Holy War to the Cross

The New Testament reframes the same cosmic battle. “We wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities and powers.”ⁱ⁹ The language of ḥērem continues — but it’s now spiritual, not physical.

At the cross, Christ “disarmed the rulers and authorities and made a public spectacle of them.”²⁰ In that act, the old war of Deuteronomy 7 reached its final fulfillment. God once reclaimed Canaan from the gods; now He reclaims the whole world through His Son.

The unseen realm that Israel once feared has already been conquered. What remains is for us to walk faithfully in that victory — destroying idols not with swords, but with truth, love, and loyalty to the King.

Another Perspective: The Classical Reading of Deuteronomy 7

While I personally support the view outlined above — that Deuteronomy 7 reflects a deeper spiritual reality, one that reveals a cosmic war between Yahweh and the powers behind the nations — it’s also true that many scholars read this passage differently. They see it not through the lens of supernatural conflict, but within the cultural, historical, and ethical frameworks of the ancient Near East.

These scholars agree that Deuteronomy 7 presents a difficult text, but they understand its language, logic, and moral intent in a way that focuses more on covenant holiness and less on the unseen realm.

1. Historical and Cultural Framing

Writers such as K. Lawson Younger and Kenneth Kitchen remind us that ancient Near Eastern kings commonly used totalizing language — “left no survivors,” “utterly destroyed,” and similar expressions — as rhetorical hyperbole for decisive victory.²¹ The Israelites, as a Near Eastern people, spoke in that same idiom.

This means that when Deuteronomy speaks of “utterly destroying” the nations, it may not describe literal extermination, but covenantal victory: a command to break their political and religious power rather than to annihilate every person. Archaeological and textual evidence support this: numerous Canaanite populations remained after Israel’s settlement (Judges 1), and Israel coexisted and even intermarried with them in later generations.²²

2. Covenant and Ritual Purity

Scholars such as John Walton and J. Harvey Walton argue that the real issue in Deuteronomy 7 is the danger of syncretism, not ethnic cleansing. The Canaanites’ religious system — filled with idol worship, ritual prostitution, and child sacrifice — represented an existential threat to Israel’s covenant identity.

In this view, the command to destroy altars and idols (Deut 7:5) is the heart of the passage, while the command to “destroy the people” is a literary extension of that same idea. Israel must purge idolatry completely, leaving no trace of its influence.²³

Thus, ḥērem becomes a ritual act of devotion, not an act of hatred — a symbolic way of saying, “Nothing in this land belongs to Baal anymore; it all belongs to Yahweh.”

3. The Moral and Theological Logic

Philosophers and theologians such as Paul Copan, Nicholas Wolterstorff, and Christopher Wright explain that divine judgment in the Old Testament always arises from God’s justice, not caprice. The Canaanites are portrayed as persistently wicked — cultures steeped in violence and idolatry — and God’s patience had lasted centuries.²⁴

The conquest, in this classical understanding, was judicial and covenantal. It had clear moral boundaries:

• God gave explicit warnings beforehand (Genesis 15:16).
• Mercy was available to those who turned to Him (Rahab, the Gibeonites).²⁵
• The process was gradual and measured: “The LORD your God will clear away these nations before you little by little.” (Deut 7:22).²⁶

This approach presents Deuteronomy 7 as a temporal act of divine justice carried out within a particular redemptive moment — a stage in the story leading to the cross, not a timeless model for human warfare.

4. Reading Holy War as Redemptive History

In this more traditional reading, Israel’s conquest is understood as a necessary phase in God’s redemptive plan, preparing the land for His presence and for the future Messiah. The conquest establishes a holy nation through which the nations of the world will ultimately be blessed.

As Christopher Wright puts it,

“God’s actions in history, even when they involve judgment, are always instrumental in achieving a larger purpose of salvation.”²⁷

From this perspective, Deuteronomy 7 teaches not cosmic geography but ethical geography — the boundaries of holiness, faithfulness, and idolatry in the life of God’s people.

5. Israel’s Warfare and the Church’s Witness

Finally, classical interpreters note that Israel’s physical warfare prefigures the Church’s spiritual struggle against sin and idolatry. In the New Testament, holy war is transformed:

• Instead of swords, believers wield the “armor of God” (Eph 6:12–17).
• Instead of destroying cities, they demolish arguments and false ideologies (2 Cor 10:4–5).
• Instead of claiming territory, they extend the kingdom through proclamation and discipleship.

In that sense, both the supernatural and classical readings converge: the final victory belongs to Christ, who conquers the powers of evil — whether we describe them as demonic forces or as human systems of sin.

Two Lenses, One Lord

Whether we interpret Deuteronomy 7 as a confrontation with spiritual powers, as Heiser’s framework suggests, or as an ancient holy war aimed at covenant purity, the heart of the passage is the same: God is holy. Idolatry destroys. And the people of God must not make peace with what defiles His dwelling place.

One approach highlights the unseen realm; the other highlights human responsibility in the seen world. Both reveal a God who is jealous for His people’s worship and relentless in His purpose to restore creation under His rule.

Epilogue: The Seen and the Unseen Made One

At the end of the day, both ways of reading Deuteronomy 7 lead us to the same unshakable truth: God will not share His glory with another.

Whether we emphasize the spiritual realm that Michael Heiser so brilliantly illuminated — with its rebellious divine powers and cosmic geography — or whether we see the passage as a historical call to covenant holiness, both point to the same God who wages war against all that corrupts His creation.

In the ancient world, that war was fought with swords, altars, and earthly kingdoms. In our world, it’s fought within hearts, minds, and nations still tempted by the same idols in new forms. The battleground has changed, but the principle remains: holiness cannot coexist with idolatry.

The book of Deuteronomy pointed forward to the day when Yahweh Himself would step into the battle — when the unseen would take on flesh. In Jesus Christ, the line between visible and invisible vanishes. He enters both worlds — the physical and the spiritual — and wins the war none of us could fight.

The conquest of Canaan prepared the way for Israel.
The conquest of the cross prepared the way for the world.

Deuteronomy 7 may have begun with the destruction of idols in a land once ruled by other gods, but it ends — in Christ — with the destruction of sin itself. That’s the story beneath the story: the Holy One reclaiming His world, one heart, one nation, one soul at a time.

Footnotes

¹ Numbers 13:28–33; cf. “We saw the Nephilim there (the sons of Anak, who come from the Nephilim).”

² Deuteronomy 1:26–36; Numbers 14:1–4, 22–23 (Israel’s rebellion and forty years of wandering).

³ Genesis 6:1–4; Michael S. Heiser, The Unseen Realm: Recovering the Supernatural Worldview of the Bible(Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2015), 97–103.

⁴ Deuteronomy 7:5; cf. John H. Walton and J. Harvey Walton, The Lost World of the Israelite Conquest (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2017), ch. 7.

⁵ K. Lawson Younger Jr., Ancient Conquest Accounts: A Study in Ancient Near Eastern and Biblical History Writing(Sheffield Academic Press, 1990).

⁶ Judges 1:27–36; Joshua 13:1–6.

⁷ Deuteronomy 32:8–9 (Dead Sea Scrolls and LXX readings); cf. Heiser, Unseen Realm, ch. 14.

⁸ Psalm 82; Heiser, The Unseen Realm, 172–180.

⁹ Michael S. Heiser, Reversing Hermon: Enoch, the Watchers, and the Forgotten Mission of Jesus Christ (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2017), 259.

ⁱ⁰ Numbers 13:33; Deuteronomy 2:10–11, 20–21; Joshua 11:21–22.

ⁱ¹ Deuteronomy 3:11.

ⁱ² 1 Enoch 6–16; Jubilees 5; cf. Heiser, Demons: What the Bible Really Says About the Powers of Darkness(Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2020), 81–85.

ⁱ³ Heiser, Demons, 83–84; Reversing Hermon, ch. 9.

ⁱ⁴ Heiser, Unseen Realm, 180–182.

ⁱ⁵ Deuteronomy 7:22.

ⁱ⁶ Paul Copan, Is God a Moral Monster? Making Sense of the Old Testament God (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2011), 177–181.

ⁱ⁷ 1 Enoch 15–16; Jubilees 10.

ⁱ⁸ Heiser, Reversing Hermon, 257–261.

ⁱ⁹ Ephesians 6:12.

²⁰ Colossians 2:15.

²¹ K. Lawson Younger Jr., Ancient Conquest Accounts: A Study in Ancient Near Eastern and Biblical History Writing(Sheffield: Sheffield Academic, 1990), 241–256.

²² Kenneth A. Kitchen, On the Reliability of the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2003), 159–165; cf. Judges 1:27–36.

²³ John H. Walton and J. Harvey Walton, The Lost World of the Israelite Conquest (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2017), 92–97.

²⁴ Paul Copan, Is God a Moral Monster? (Grand Rapids: Baker, 2011), 177–181; Nicholas Wolterstorff, Divine Discourse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995); Christopher J. H. Wright, The God I Don’t Understand(Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2008), 93–110.

²⁵ Joshua 2:8–14; Joshua 9:3–27.

²⁶ Deuteronomy 7:22; cf. Exodus 23:29–30.

²⁷ Christopher J. H. Wright, The Mission of God: Unlocking the Bible’s Grand Narrative (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2006), 268–271.

Tom Dallis

Christian apologist, theologian, author, and former documentary filmmaker with a strong academic and ministry background. Graduate of Cedarville University (B.A. Speech Communications, Pre-Seminary Bible), Emmanuel Theological Seminary (Th.M. and Th.D. in Christian Apologetics and New Testament Textual Criticism), and the Israel Bible Center (Postgraduate studies in Biblical Hebrew). Produced faith-based documentaries through Ensign Media, distributed by Vision Video and Gateway Films. Husband to Kathy, father, and grandfather. Resides in Morrow, Ohio.

See Full Bio